The output of falco (1.2.3) and fastqc (0.12.1) is markedly different for polyA stats (and I assume would also be for polyG, but haven't tested).
I haven't looked into the actual code producing them, but compared to fastqc the values from falco seem to increase much faster, here's an example of the corresponding section of the reports:
The output of falco (1.2.3) and fastqc (0.12.1) is markedly different for polyA stats (and I assume would also be for polyG, but haven't tested). I haven't looked into the actual code producing them, but compared to fastqc the values from falco seem to increase much faster, here's an example of the corresponding section of the reports:
First fastqc:
next falco:
My first guess would be that falco counts longer polyA runs multiple times?
The input data was https://raw.githubusercontent.com/galaxyproject/tools-iuc/6b50408a1ff7902575be37b2fa21aa80fe684e5c/tools/falco/test-data/1000trimmed.fastq and both tools where run with just default settings.