Closed elwazana closed 6 years ago
@elwazana, I think you might have missed the factor of 1/1000 in front of the equation. For h this is a better way to write it. I don't know the issue number, but we discussed this long ago (before your time). We should use the same notation in the case study SRS and in the MIS.
I'm glad to see that you have left t in mm. t is just a "label" for the different thicknesses of glass. It doesn't really have units in the sense that it never appears in any equations directly.
SRS updated:
bb6bd8e43e44a92db7c30a4fcc75796f288484e4
MIS update:
4a28219317875fe0f3602d9dc42319e6083ec732
In the MIS version, please remove the "h = " part. out has the role of taking the output as defined by the equation. h doesn't actually have any meaning here.
Here is the fix:
c429853565b151acef666a4ac65648d80f8cc8d5
looks good.
@smiths Hello Dr. Smith, I missed this when I was converting symbols from mm to m and am creating this issue to keep track of it.
h
was changed from mm to m, however, the actual values weren't. So I'm pretty sure these values: Drasil:It also appears in the MIS:![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/35268928/43274266-b88980e6-90cc-11e8-8af0-063e77467899.png)
This issue is related ti issue #139, as the Minimum Thickness is calculated based on the Nominal Thickness.