search

smiths / caseStudies

Case studies of (manual) documentation for scientific computing software
3 stars 2 forks source link

System VnV plan #11 #195

Closed Malavika-Srinivasan closed 5 years ago

Malavika-Srinivasan commented 5 years ago

@oluowoj

Hi Olu,

In TC8, I think it is better to have two separate test cases which deal with correctness and performance. They are two different qualities and your explanation for how the test will be performed needs more clarity. I guess for correctness, you need parallel implementation and for performance, you really need to define whether it is speed or accuracy or any other performance attribute and ways to measure them. Please rework this test case.

Malavika-Srinivasan commented 5 years ago

@oluowoj

Hi Olu,

I guess you don't need these many non functional requirements. Because some of the qualities may not be very important for your software. Just think about them, because all these qualities may be very ambitious for a software.

oluowoj commented 5 years ago

I put them there as I assumed @smith mentioned that we need to add all the NFR from our SRS. I could just add the important and testable ones if that's the case.

oluowoj commented 5 years ago

Or maybe I need to word my response about NFR, ideally, I think the NFRs listed are expected of the software although I might not be able to account for all in this phase of the project, I would still keep them all in the document probably for future enhancements. @smith what do you think?

oluowoj commented 5 years ago

@Malavika-Srinivasan, I will rework them as specified though. Thanks

oluowoj commented 5 years ago

Fixed with eadea18.Correctness and performance are now separated