Closed shandysulen closed 7 months ago
Thank you for your question :-)
I agree the formulation is not the best here. However, sending to an address has no particular meaning to me. An address is just a (big) number. The data only makes sense in the case of a transaction.
I guess we should just rewrite to "The calldata region is the data sent to a smart contract transaction". What do you think?
I'm a fan of the rewrite! I find it succint and more clear in its meaning :)
In The calldata section of About the EVM, the paragraph begins with:
"sent to a transaction as part of a smart contract transaction" caught me off guard when I read it as it seems redundant and just wanted to double-check if it was intentional. Is it meant to be "sent to an address as part of a smart contract transaction"?