This pull request refactors the walk_directory function for improved readability and consistency.
Changes Made:
Replaced the variable names root, dirs, and files with dirpath, _, and filenames respectively for better clarity.
Updated the variable assignment for relative_filepath to use os.path.join(dirpath, file) instead of os.path.join(root, file) to ensure consistency.
No changes were made to the core functionality of the function.
Reason for Changes:
The original code had inconsistent variable names and lacked clarity in certain areas. This refactor aims to enhance code readability, adhere to Python naming conventions, and maintain a consistent coding style throughout the function.
Testing Done:
I tested the modified walk_directory function on various directories containing both image and code files. I verified that code files were correctly read and stored in the code_contents dictionary. Additionally, I ensured that the exception handling worked as expected when encountering file read errors.
This pull request refactors the
walk_directory
function for improved readability and consistency.Changes Made:
root
,dirs
, andfiles
withdirpath
,_
, andfilenames
respectively for better clarity.relative_filepath
to useos.path.join(dirpath, file)
instead ofos.path.join(root, file)
to ensure consistency.Reason for Changes:
The original code had inconsistent variable names and lacked clarity in certain areas. This refactor aims to enhance code readability, adhere to Python naming conventions, and maintain a consistent coding style throughout the function.
Testing Done:
I tested the modified
walk_directory
function on various directories containing both image and code files. I verified that code files were correctly read and stored in thecode_contents
dictionary. Additionally, I ensured that the exception handling worked as expected when encountering file read errors.