Closed thvdveld closed 9 months ago
Attention: 7 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
36a143d
) 79.62% compared to head (73ac7a4
) 79.58%. Report is 9 commits behind head on main.:exclamation: Current head 73ac7a4 differs from pull request most recent head 3369fb9. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3369fb9 to get more accurate results
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
src/iface/interface/mod.rs | 61.53% | 5 Missing :warning: |
src/socket/dns.rs | 0.00% | 1 Missing :warning: |
src/socket/udp.rs | 0.00% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Wait, this was merged when CI failed, how could the merge queue do that. I thought this was not possible as it said merge when ready with ready being all checks successful.
Wait, this was merged when CI failed, how could the merge queue do that. I thought this was not possible as it said merge when ready with ready being all checks successful.
This can happen if the merge queue is not set up correctly. I see tests
has been skipped, is that the required check? Skipped checks are counterintuitively considered successful for merge queue purposes.
I have no idea why that one was skipped. I don't see it in the workflow files. And I think all CI jobs are required: https://github.com/smoltcp-rs/smoltcp/pull/872#issuecomment-1849762059
When the destination address of the TCP packet was unspecified and the packet was not handled by any socket, smoltcp would transmit a TCP RST packet back. We should never transmit a packet with a source address unspecified.