I'm developing an application that responds to requests on multiple host names having several different subdomain names under the same main (second-level) domain (for example customer-a.example.org, customer-b.example.org, customer-c.example.org). The setup is described in this blog post: https://blog.gazler.com/blog/2015/07/18/subdomains-with-phoenix/. However, the application does not respond to requests on the main (second-level) domain name (in this example: example.org).
Since ExAdmin links to static resources (JavaScript and CSS) used by the templates active_admin.html.eex and admin_lte2.html.eex by using the function static_url, these resources fail to load in my application. The generated links don't include the subdomain name, like this:
Is there a reason why static_url is used rather than static_path? This PR suggests switching to using static_path which would be really helpful for applications using subdomains in this way.
I'm developing an application that responds to requests on multiple host names having several different subdomain names under the same main (second-level) domain (for example
customer-a.example.org,customer-b.example.org,customer-c.example.org). The setup is described in this blog post: https://blog.gazler.com/blog/2015/07/18/subdomains-with-phoenix/. However, the application does not respond to requests on the main (second-level) domain name (in this example:example.org).Since ExAdmin links to static resources (JavaScript and CSS) used by the templates
active_admin.html.eexandadmin_lte2.html.eexby using the functionstatic_url, these resources fail to load in my application. The generated links don't include the subdomain name, like this:https://example.org/css/admin_lte2-4b903242aada0f319f0e076944273dfc.css?vsn=d https://example.org/js/jquery.min-cfb4c11ee8b6c29969a2a615604d49f9.js?vsn=d
Is there a reason why
static_urlis used rather thanstatic_path? This PR suggests switching to usingstatic_pathwhich would be really helpful for applications using subdomains in this way.