search

smrose / ps

Pattern Sphere application, part of the Public Sphere Project.
0 stars 0 forks source link

assessment results of ALL patterns should be sorted by accumulated scores (per Meter) not segregated by origin and then sorted #24

Open publicsphere opened 2 months ago

publicsphere commented 2 months ago

The assessment results of ALL patterns should be sorted by accumulated scores (per Meter) not segregated by origin and then sorted. For example, using data from the screenshot below, all patterns that received 2 "good" ratings, regardless of origin, should be listed together.

And, also, the sorting first by origin issue (that I'm suggesting is the cause of the representational issues) might not be the source of the problem (or the only source). When looking at "Attitudes and Aspirations" and "Coordination Support", shouldn't the one that had one "excellent" assessment be listed above the one that had one "good" assessment?

Screenshot 2024-05-09 at 11 01 13 AM
smrose commented 1 week ago

For Post-growth, we will use 2 for the "good" tag and 3 for "excellent. For each project, we need a column in the project table that associates a score with each tag. The overall score of each pattern in a project is the accumulated value across all assessments of that pattern.

publicsphere commented 1 week ago

Also continue the practice of the darker / thicker horizontal lines associating patterns with identical scores into groups.