search

smurfy / fahrplan

QT Application for Public transportation
GNU General Public License v2.0
58 stars 33 forks source link

3.4 segfaults. #278

Closed poetaster closed 1 year ago

poetaster commented 3 years ago

Sailfish, of course. Looks like end of the line.

Time to fork? I'm going to pick this apart for a sailfish build.

poetaster commented 3 years ago

I just did a compile without any changes using the 3.4 SDK. All's well. Just works.

If you'd like I can take of maintaining?

smurfy commented 3 years ago

Does it work with older versions too or does it needs two builds?

I updated my other half to 3.4 now. but need to install all my sdk's again.

poetaster commented 3 years ago

I believe it stopped working on 3.4. Installing the sdks is indeed a pita. I've only got, currently, one device and it was flashed directly to 3.4. I can try to get my fp2 running with, 3.3 for instance. have to ask mal for an image.

My compile had only the bahn.de backend (great for me :) enabled.

poetaster commented 3 years ago

Ah, in the comments under: https://openrepos.net/content/smurfy/fahrplan-0 At least one other user notes the segfaults as of 3.4.

Some users at: https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/fahrplan-2-0-32-2/5388/4

mention that the old compile works for them under 3.4 and 4 ... I've asked if it was the openrepos or jolla compile

Olf0 commented 2 years ago

Just curious: Is this still being addressed, or at least analysed?

Note that varying compilation results with different build environments (e.g., a freshly installed SFOS-SDK vs. one used for long) might be a consequence of what Pull Request 273 "Add missing build dependencies" addresses.

P.S.: @smurfy, there are a couple of other PRs, many of which seem to make a lot of sense and IMO are looking fine, but all are stalled since early 2019. Some of them contain meta-questions or -statements, which may ease your life, e.g., PR #269: "@smurfy is it possible for @dayrover to get write access?"