search

smurk-too / cleanrip

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/cleanrip
0 stars 0 forks source link

Speed comparison? #2

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I didn't have a problem, but:

What is the speed compared to SuperDump?  Does it depend on the filesystem 
being ripped to?  What is the difference in speed between USB1.0 and USB2.0?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by school.p...@gmail.com on 14 Sep 2010 at 10:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
USB2 should get you the maximum speed that the disc can be read at (about 
6-7MB/s) where as USB1 would get you about 1mb/s maximum. 

I rip GC Games in 9 minutes to my sluggish USB FAT32 device and they are 1.35GB 
in size, so you can work it out from there how long a 4.37GB game would take. 
NTFS vs FAT32 does not have any performance difference from what I was able to 
see.

Original comment by emuki...@gmail.com on 14 Sep 2010 at 11:22

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by emuki...@gmail.com on 14 Sep 2010 at 11:23

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
WOW.  SuperDump took 30 mins to rip GC, although same for Wii SL.

Original comment by school.p...@gmail.com on 15 Sep 2010 at 12:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
GC discs read at 3x, whilst Wii discs rip at 6x, so that makes sense.

Original comment by emuki...@gmail.com on 15 Sep 2010 at 2:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by emuki...@gmail.com on 15 Sep 2010 at 5:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Actually, it doesn't.  Are you saying that Superdump reads at 3x and CleanRip 
reads at 9x for GC discs?  Or SUperdump reads at 1x and CleanRip at 3x?

And: 1.35 x 2 = 2.70, not 4.35.

Original comment by school.p...@gmail.com on 15 Sep 2010 at 10:22