snakemake / snakemake-wrappers

This is the development home of the Snakemake wrapper repository, see
https://snakemake-wrappers.readthedocs.io
215 stars 186 forks source link

feat: Sex.DetERRmine #3497

Open tdayris opened 2 days ago

tdayris commented 2 days ago

Add a wrapper for Sex.detERRmine.

QC

While the contributions guidelines are more extensive, please particularly ensure that:

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 days ago
πŸ“ Walkthrough
πŸ“ Walkthrough ## Walkthrough This pull request introduces several new files and configurations for the `sexdeterrmine` bioinformatics tool. It includes a Conda environment file (`environment.linux-64.pin.txt`) and a YAML configuration file (`environment.yaml`) to specify dependencies and channels. A metadata file (`meta.yaml`) provides essential information about the tool's functionality and requirements. Additionally, a Snakemake wrapper (`wrapper.py`) is added to facilitate execution, along with a test function (`test_sexdeterrmine`) in `test_wrappers.py` to validate the workflow. ## Changes | File | Change Summary | |------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | `bio/sexdeterrmine/environment.linux-64.pin.txt` | New file created for Conda environment with specific package URLs. | | `bio/sexdeterrmine/environment.yaml` | New YAML file added specifying channels and a dependency on `sexdeterrmine=1.1.2`. | | `bio/sexdeterrmine/meta.yaml` | New metadata file created with details about the tool, including name, description, authorship, input/output specifications, and notes. | | `bio/sexdeterrmine/test/Snakefile` | New rule `test_sexdeterrmine` added to define inputs and outputs for testing the tool. | | `bio/sexdeterrmine/wrapper.py` | New Snakemake wrapper introduced to manage execution of the `sexdeterrmine` tool with specified parameters. | | `test_wrappers.py` | New test function `test_sexdeterrmine(run)` added to execute the Snakemake command for the workflow. | ## Possibly related PRs - **#3135**: Introduces a new Conda environment file for the Deeptools project, which is similar to the main PR's introduction of `environment.linux-64.pin.txt` for the `sexdeterrmine` package. - **#3139**: The introduction of `environment.yaml` for the Rseqc package parallels the main PR's addition of `environment.yaml` for `sexdeterrmine`. - **#3140**: Similar to the main PR, this PR introduces a new `environment.yaml` file for the Rseqc inner distance tool. - **#3162**: This PR adds a new `environment.linux-64.pin.txt` file for the Bwameth project, akin to the main PR's addition for `sexdeterrmine`. - **#3165**: The introduction of `environment.linux-64.pin.txt` for the Nanosim tool mirrors the main PR's creation of the same type of file for `sexdeterrmine`. - **#3372**: This PR addresses issues related to input files in subfolders and updates the `meta.yaml` file, which is relevant to the main PR's focus on environment management for the `sexdeterrmine` package. - **#3452**: The addition of a wrapper for the `vg autoindex` command in this PR is related to the main PR's focus on creating a structured environment for the `sexdeterrmine` package. - **#3453**: This PR introduces a wrapper for the `prinseq++` tool, which is similar to the main PR's introduction of the `sexdeterrmine` package. - **#3496**: The introduction of the `MTNucRatioCalculator` wrapper in this PR aligns with the main PR's focus on establishing a new environment for the `sexdeterrmine` package.

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@tdayris has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 25 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review.

βŒ› How to resolve this issue? After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.
🚦 How do rate limits work? CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/faq) for further information.
πŸ“₯ Commits Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0e3e017656ce5ca37a47a301582573b21f45f5d2 and a00cdcd0d7e24d46f95662ec5d4117b046549daa.

πŸ“œ Recent review details **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**
πŸ“₯ Commits Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0e3e017656ce5ca37a47a301582573b21f45f5d2 and a00cdcd0d7e24d46f95662ec5d4117b046549daa.
πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1) * `test_wrappers.py` (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1) * test_wrappers.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
πŸͺ§ Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.