refactor: N-10 Naming Suggestions

[pscott]

• [x] rename validate -> decided against, want to preserve SX-EVM compatibility and we feel like the wording is "ok"
• [x] rename update_proposal -> decided against, as update_proposal can also update the metadata_uri, and I feel like it would be too verbose
• [x] rename target when appropriate https://github.com/snapshot-labs/sx-starknet/pull/590/commits/b9c2755d655820e2f86926400a54da7b2179908f
• [x] rename l1_account_address a571f1b728d8ac92369c11c7cb9996f0ccb1e1f5
• [x] rename reinitialize 5bb2b0100c0905ab4e72479c3a1e7c14fbf31a3f
• [x] rename EthBalanceOfVotingStrategy 4aa949e68cb02f2b38454e705285ce70db3ea80f && 74a7452490167be9a2f56b5de9ae0f151721da4c && https://github.com/snapshot-labs/sx-starknet/pull/590/commits/0b563e2c9f672b3afeb838bb1bac417dbac25fb4

Closes #572

[Orland0x]

should we rename eth_tx to l1_tx? Might be worth being consistent to remove all mentions of 'eth' unless it specifically refers to the token itself

[pscott]

should we rename eth_tx to l1_tx? Might be worth being consistent to remove all mentions of 'eth' unless it specifically refers to the token itself

I don't know about that, if I say out loud "you can authenticate via an eth signature" or "you can authenticate via an l1 signature" I feel like the former is clearer ?

[Orland0x]

should we rename eth_tx to l1_tx? Might be worth being consistent to remove all mentions of 'eth' unless it specifically refers to the token itself

I don't know about that, if I say out loud "you can authenticate via an eth signature" or "you can authenticate via an l1 signature" I feel like the former is clearer ?

yeah true