Closed pierreb4 closed 5 years ago
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:09:52AM +0000, pierreb4 wrote:
This is broken in bgpq3-0.1.31
Looks like it is already fixed in 0.1.35 and HEAD. Can I ask you to update and check again ?
Expected output:
no ipv6 prefix-list NN ipv6 prefix-list NN permit 2001:67c:1010::/47 ipv6 prefix-list NN permit 2001:67c:1010::/48 ipv6 prefix-list NN permit 2001:67c:1011::/48 ipv6 prefix-list NN permit 2001:7fe::/32 ipv6 prefix-list NN permit 2001:7fe::/33 ipv6 prefix-list NN permit 2001:dd8:10::/47 ipv6 prefix-list NN permit 2001:dd8:10::/48 ipv6 prefix-list NN permit 2001:dd8:11::/48 ipv6 prefix-list NN permit 2a01:3f1::/38 ipv6 prefix-list NN permit 2a01:3f1:3000::/38 ipv6 prefix-list NN permit 2a01:3f1:5000::/38 ipv6 prefix-list NN permit 2a01:3f1:8000::/38 ipv6 prefix-list NN permit 2a01:3f1:a000::/38 ipv6 prefix-list NN permit 2a01:3f1:c000::/38
Current output:
no ipv6 prefix-list NN ! generated prefix-list NN is empty ipv6 prefix-list NN deny ::/0
Using the same function call on line 690 as the one on line 687 fixes it for this object (with pipeline disabled). It might break other things though.
Thanks!
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.*
Ah yes, this works with bgpq3-0.1.35.
I grabbed 0.1.31 because it looked like the newest at: http://snar.spb.ru/prog/bgpq3/
Closing this. Thanks again!
This is broken in bgpq3-0.1.31
Expected output:
Current output:
Using the same function call on line 690 as the one on line 687 fixes it for this object (with pipeline disabled). It might break other things though.
Thanks!