Closed edent closed 1 week ago
Hi Terence, good to see you here! Absolutely, this is a good idea. I think we're tracking this as #758, would that work for you?
@snarfed 👋
In my case, no. Because I haven't written the code to read DMs 🤣
But, in general, yes.
I think this is distinct enough to track it separately. (There's probably not much overlap in the eventual message compared to #758.)
The catch is, the "error response" here is an internal log message that you only see if you click through from your user page on https://fed.brid.gy/ . Exposing logs publicly has been useful, but also confusing and flaky. I've added a few band-aids here and there, but making it actually reliable and useful would take distributed tracing across the backend infrastructure, which would be a big project that realistically I doubt I'd prioritize. If anything, I'd just remove the logs altogether.
Previously: https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/issues/620, https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/issues/541, etc
Fair enough. I can accept that I'm a niche 😄
I'll merge this into #758, in that case.
I was unable to receive a follow from the AP-Bsky bridge.
When I finally read the documentation I saw that my account wasn't yet 2 weeks old. I fixed that, and it worked.
However, the response I received to my initial follow request was:
(Truncated for clarity)
Would it be possible / sensible to add an error message to that response explaining the problem?