How do you feel about making urlPatternInstance.names a part of the public API? It helps my use case to know what parameter names are used in the pattern string.
@luggage66 hey donald, apologies for taking so long to respond. i'm traveling at the moment. the change looks good. i'll test, merge and release this soon
How do you feel about making urlPatternInstance.names a part of the public API? It helps my use case to know what parameter names are used in the pattern string.