This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build went from success to failure.
As eslint is “only” a devDependency of this project it might not break production or downstream projects, but “only” your build or test tools – preventing new deploys or publishes.
I recommend you give this issue a high priority. I’m sure you can resolve this :muscle:
Of course this could just be a false positive, caused by a flaky test suite, or third parties that are currently broken or unavailable, but that would be another problem I’d recommend working on.
Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?
There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.
Hello lovely humans,
eslint just published its new version 3.7.0.
This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build went from success to failure.
As eslint is “only” a devDependency of this project it might not break production or downstream projects, but “only” your build or test tools – preventing new deploys or publishes.
I recommend you give this issue a high priority. I’m sure you can resolve this :muscle:
Of course this could just be a false positive, caused by a flaky test suite, or third parties that are currently broken or unavailable, but that would be another problem I’d recommend working on.
Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right? Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?
There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.
Good luck with your project :sparkles:
You rock!
:palm_tree:
GitHub Release
prefer-numeric-literals
(#7205) (Teddy Katz)no-undef-init
(#7210) (Teddy Katz)no-unused-vars
false positive (fixes #7250) (#7258) (Toru Nagashima)indent
handles nested functions correctly (fixes #7249) (#7265) (Teddy Katz)no-useless-computed-key
(#7207) (Teddy Katz)lines-around-directive
(#7217) (Teddy Katz)wrap-iife
(#7196) (Teddy Katz)dot-location
(#7186) (Teddy Katz)yoda
, add a fixer (#7199) (Teddy Katz)no-extra-parens
false negative (fixes #7229) (#7231) (Teddy Katz)The new version differs by 122 commits .
029e844
3.7.0
d334663
Build: package.json and changelog update for 3.7.0
2fee8ad
Fix: object-shorthand's consistent-as-needed option (issue #7214) (#7215)
c05a19c
Update: add fixer for
prefer-numeric-literals
(#7205)2f171f3
Update: add fixer for
no-undef-init
(#7210)876d747
Docs: Steps for adding new committers/TSCers (#7221)
dffb4fa
Fix:
no-unused-vars
false positive (fixes #7250) (#7258)4448cec
Docs: Adding missing ES8 reference to configuring (#7271)
332d213
Update: Ensure
indent
handles nested functions correctly (fixes #7249) (#7265)c36d842
Update: add fixer for
no-useless-computed-key
(#7207)18376cf
Update: add fixer for
lines-around-directive
(#7217)f8e8fab
Update: add fixer for
wrap-iife
(#7196)558b444
Docs: Add @not-an-aardvark to development team (#7279)
cd1dc57
Update: Add a fixer for
dot-location
(#7186)89787b2
Update: for
yoda
, add a fixer (#7199)There are 122 commits in total. See the full diff.
This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
Tired of seeing this sponsor message? :zap:
greenkeeper upgrade