Closed drekka closed 12 years ago
Huh — what error did you get exactly? There's nothing wrong with the code ... the function is static and gets called with a parameter of kWarningPrefix, so a pointer comparison is valid.
(Also, minor nit: your inserted line isn't indented properly.)
I'm getting "direct comparison of a string literal has undefined behavior" which I found referenced in http://root.cern.ch/svn/root/trunk/interpreter/llvm/src/tools/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
which seems to be based around @"x" == @"y"
or obj == @"x"
scenarios. I don't know if this is new or not. If I understand your code correctly you are attempting to check that two pointers are pointing to the same address as a way of asking if both variables contain a reference to the same constant string. That makes sense to me and I presume it would be faster so I'm not sure why Clang is defending against it.
A small fix. My compiler settings would not let this through so I had to change it to use isEqualToString:.