KonradHoeffner
commented
5 years ago There are only 190 node pairs with overlapping edges now:
select count(*)
{
select distinct ?s ?o
from <http://www.snik.eu/ontology>
{
?s ?p ?o.
?s ?q ?o.
?s a owl:Class.
?o a owl:Class.
filter(?p!=?q).
filter(isIRI(?o)).
filter(?p!=meta:subTopClass&&(?q!=meta:subTopClass))
}
}From 10228 node pairs with edges:
select count(*)
{
select distinct ?s ?o
from <http://www.snik.eu/ontology>
{
?s ?p ?o.
?s a owl:Class.
?o a owl:Class.
}
}So less than 2% of edges should have this problem now.
Update: There are also 75 cases with reversed directions:
select count(*)
{
select distinct ?s ?o
from <http://www.snik.eu/ontology>
{
?s ?p ?o.
?o ?q ?s.
?s a owl:Class.
?o a owl:Class.
filter(?p!=?q).
filter(isIRI(?o)).
filter(?p!=meta:subTopClass&&(?q!=meta:subTopClass))
}
}
The edge "bb:ServerCluster meta:entityTypeComponent bb:Server" is incorrect.
Details Hier überlagern sich zwei Bezeichnungen für die Relation und man kann es nicht mehr lesen. Siehe auch #59 .AW