KonradHoeffner
commented
4 years ago Open KonradHoeffner opened 5 years ago
KonradHoeffner
commented
4 years ago KonradHoeffner
commented
4 years ago I deleted them using the following query but there were 144 triples deleted from he which I didn't expect so I restored the backup and will investigate this first to be sure.
sparql
delete
{
?x ?p ?o.
}
from <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb>
{
?x ?p ?o.
filter(?p=owl:annotatedSource OR ?p=owl:annotatedTarget)
MINUS {?o a ?something.}
}The problem with he comes from it being cut into two parts, he and he-unconsolidated.
KonradHoeffner
commented
4 years ago The following classes in he are not existing:
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/ITStrategie http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/angebotsorientierterAnsatz http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/QuantitativeMessgroesse http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/StrategischerErfolgsfaktor http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/Vogehensmodell http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/CIO http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/administrativeAufgabe http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/SituationsanalyseVogehensweise
KonradHoeffner
commented
4 years ago I put he-unconsolidated back in the snik graph group so that it is shown in LodView.
KonradHoeffner
commented
4 years ago OK, let's investigate this more thoroughly:
Select triples that should be deleted if there isn't a way to correct the object:
select ?x ?y ?z
{
?x ?y ?z.
{select ?x
{
?x owl:annotatedSource|owl:annotatedTarget ?o.
MINUS {?o a ?something.}
}}
} order by ?xCreate a backup.
Select just the objects, go through them and see if we can fix some of them:
select distinct ?o
{
?x owl:annotatedSource|owl:annotatedTarget ?o.
MINUS {?o a ?something.}
}he:CIO exists as he:ChiefInformationOfficer, so correct this renaming as well:
SPARQL
with <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he> # "with" specifies the graph that the query modifies
delete
{
?x ?p <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/CIO> . # delete our original triple
}
insert
{
?x ?p <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/ChiefInformationOfficer> . # insert the new triple
}
where
{
?x ?p <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/CIO> . # again our original triple
}SPARQL
with <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he-unconsolidated> # "with" specifies the graph that the query modifies
delete
{
?x ?p <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/CIO> . # delete our original triple
}
insert
{
?x ?p <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/ChiefInformationOfficer> . # insert the new triple
}
where
{
?x ?p <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/CIO> . # again our original triple
}Also fixed a typo in the skos:definition.
KonradHoeffner
commented
4 years ago he:ITStrategie exists as he/ItStrategie, it was probably just renamed improperly, so fix this by renaming again in both he-graphs. This one was the one that actually changed things:
SPARQL
with <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he> # "with" specifies the graph that the query modifies
delete
{
?x ?p <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/ITStrategie> . # delete our original triple
}
insert
{
?x ?p <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/ItStrategie> . # insert the new triple
}
where
{
?x ?p <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/ITStrategie> . # again our original triple
}ob:DelphiStudy wurde in https://github.com/IMISE/snik-ontology/issues/58 in ob:DelphiMethod gemerged, wobei die Objekte wohl vergessen wurden. Daher auch hier ein rename durchführen, aber auf beiden Seiten:
SPARQL
with <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/ob> # "with" specifies the graph that the query modifies
delete
{
?x ?y <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/ob/DelphiStudy> . # delete our original triple
}
insert
{
?x ?y <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/ob/DelphiMethod> . # insert the new triple
}
where
{
?x ?y <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/ob/DelphiStudy> . # again our original triple
}SPARQL
with <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/ob> # "with" specifies the graph that the query modifies
delete
{
<http://www.snik.eu/ontology/ob/DelphiStudy> ?p ?o . # delete our original triple
}
insert
{
<http://www.snik.eu/ontology/ob/DelphiMethod> ?p ?o . # insert the new triple
}
where
{
<http://www.snik.eu/ontology/ob/DelphiStudy> ?p ?o . # again our original triple
}http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/San existiert nicht in anderer Schreibweise im bb. Es wurde aber in der Issue https://github.com/IMISE/snik-ontology/issues/214 in bb:StorageAreaNetwork gemerged. Dabei wurde aber anscheinend die Objektquery vergessen. Habe dazu jetzt noch einen Hinweis hinzugefügt im Wiki unter https://wiki.imise.uni-leipzig.de/Projekte/SNIK/ontologie/sparul.
KonradHoeffner
commented
4 years ago select *
{
graph ?g
{
{bb:ISO25000 ?p ?o.}
UNION
{?s ?p bb:ISO25000.}
}
}It doesn't show up in any issue but there is https://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/ISO25000SoftwareQuality. Is this the same concept? After some investigation I believe it is and will merge it.
SPARQL
with <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb> # "with" specifies the graph that the query modifies
delete
{
?x ?y <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/ISO25000> . # delete our original triple
}
insert
{
?x ?y <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/ISO25000SoftwareQuality> . # insert the new triple
}
where
{
?x ?y <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/ISO25000> . # again our original triple
}SPARQL
with <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb> # "with" specifies the graph that the query modifies
delete
{
<http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/ISO25000> ?x ?y . # delete our original triple
}
insert
{
<http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/ISO25000SoftwareQuality> ?x ?y . # insert the new triple
}
where
{
<http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/ISO25000> ?x ?y . # again our original triple
}select *
{
graph ?g
{
{he:QuantitativeMessgroesse ?p ?o.}
UNION
{?s ?p he:QuantitativeMessgroesse.}
}
}It isn't mentioned in any other issue and I also don't see a similar one in the search. But we can't just delete it because it is the superclass of he:Leistungsdifferenz. I created a new issue at https://github.com/IMISE/snik-ontology/issues/328 for that one, maybe Birgit knows more about this.
KonradHoeffner
commented
4 years ago @BirgitSNIK There is a typo in the URL but he:SituationsanalyseVorgehensweise does not exist. he:Situationsanalyse does exist however, is this the same concept?
select *
{
graph ?g
{
{he:SituationsanalyseVogehensweise ?p ?o.}
UNION
{?s ?p he:SituationsanalyseVogehensweise.}
}
}This one is just a typo of he:Vorgehensmodell in he, so I corrected it.
select *
{
graph ?g
{
{he:Vogehensmodell ?p ?o.}
UNION
{?s ?p he:Vogehensmodell.}
}
}Looks like a typo but https://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/AdministrativeAufgabe does not exist. There is however http://www.snik.eu/ontology/he/AdministrativeFuehrungsaufgabe. Also, according to the unconsolidated part, he:administrativeAufgabe is a subclass of he:Technologiebeschaffung. So, @BirgitSNIK : What do we do?
KonradHoeffner
commented
4 years ago Das ist wirklich nur ein Großschreibungsfehler. Korrigiere angebots... zu Angebots...
KonradHoeffner
commented
4 years ago @BirgitSNIK: Ist das das gleiche wie Kritischer Wettbewerbsfaktor, soll ich das zusammenlegen? Oder fällt das einfach weg?
KonradHoeffner
commented
4 years ago @BirgitSNIK: Am besten, wir setzen uns da mal zusammen, um das zu besprechen.
There are 16 axioms where either the source or the target doesn't exist anymore, try to save them in case there was a renaming, otherwise delete them.