snipe / snipe-it

A free open source IT asset/license management system
https://snipeitapp.com
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
11.12k stars 3.19k forks source link

Feature Request: See all broken/stolen assets from user john doe when assigning a new/replacement asset #5353

Closed samotelf closed 5 years ago

samotelf commented 6 years ago

Expected Behavior (or desired behavior if a feature request)

We have a kind of a break one asset credit rule. So, it would be awesome to get some kind of warning when deploying an asset to a user if he already broke one.

(what you expect to happen goes here)

For instance: A user broke an asset (laptop screen/mobile) and they come to IT to replace it, It would be great to somehow get notified that a user broke an asset in the past.

Actual Behavior

When deploying the asset I can see at the right the deployed assets for that user

(what actually happens goes here)

I believe that when deploying the asset I can see at the right the deployed assets for that user, but not the broken ones, maybe there's some kind of workflow or asset management that I'm not doing right? Thank you very much.

Please confirm you have done the following before posting your bug report:


Provide answers to these questions:

Please do not post an issue without answering the related questions above. If you have opened a different issue and already answered these questions, answer them again, once for every ticket. It will be next to impossible for us to help you.

https://snipe-it.readme.io/docs/getting-help

samotelf commented 6 years ago

Hello Snipe, thank you.... also just to make sure, not also if the user has broken one in the past or if the asset was stolen :) Thank you.

stale[bot] commented 6 years ago

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

samotelf commented 6 years ago

Hello, commenting because I think this would be an important step towards asset management. I hope my reply can open the ticket again. Thank you very much.

samotelf commented 6 years ago

Hello Snipe, I was wondering if you have any news on this feature request. V5? (wink:wink) I've been thinking about it and it would be nice to have a report with lost/broken assets. Right now I have created these status labels but if the asset returns (repaired/recovered) we have no way of knowing to whom the asset belonged to, unless I go to the asset's history. (AFAIK), which means that if a user broke/lost an asset I would have to check the history of all the assets with these status. It would be awesome to have some kind of report like the depreciation report or even more awesome with glitter and a unicorn, to have a warning displayed when assigning an asset to a user who already broke/lost/ one in the past (in our case 4 years for laptops and 2 for mobiles) and if so pull the monetary value in the depreciation report to follow up with the user's manager. Is this feasible? Do you think it will be implemented in the future? Thank you very much.

stale[bot] commented 6 years ago

Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!

samotelf commented 6 years ago

Dear Bot, it is still relevant :) Please make this a upcoming feature. As I mentioned earlier it would be nice to have a record of all the broken assets by user. That could come as a warning when assigning an asset to the user. Reopening it.

stale[bot] commented 6 years ago

Okay, it looks like this issue or feature request might still be important. We'll re-open it for now. Thank you for letting us know!

stale[bot] commented 5 years ago

Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!

tymik commented 5 years ago

+1 for that. i personally don't have a case for it at the moment, but it may change in future.

stale[bot] commented 5 years ago

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had recent activity. If you believe this is still an issue, please confirm that this issue is still happening in the most recent version of Snipe-IT and reply to this thread to re-open it.

tymik commented 5 years ago

It's still relevant

xAbrielx commented 5 years ago

+1 it would be very useful

chantellmocha commented 2 years ago

I agree - this would be helpful for my team as well, for obvious reasons.

HammyHavoc commented 9 months ago

Looks like I'll be creating Status for this too, this would be super useful to have properly integrated.

autorekasim commented 2 weeks ago

Not sure why this is closed, still very relevant and I'd love to see this.