snipe / snipe-it

A free open source IT asset/license management system
https://snipeitapp.com
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
10.91k stars 3.15k forks source link

Expanding user checked out asset report with assets checked out to the locations the user is the manager off. #8379

Open kgortmak opened 4 years ago

kgortmak commented 4 years ago

Server (please complete the following information):

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. We have several flexdesks in our organization that are not bound to a specific user. In the old days we would assign the assets on those desks to the department manager. You can imagine what a ton of work we had when someone moved to another location. Snipe supports the check out to locations. And locations have a manager (at least they should have ;-) ) So, we now assign these assets to the location. And when the manager is replaced, we only have to update the manager of a department with 100 assets, in stead of updating 100 assets seperately.

Describe the solution you'd like When we go to the user view, we can select as action "Print all assigned", and we get a list of assets checked out to that specific user. How cool would it be, if we could get on that same report also the assets that are checked out to the location that user is managing? It would be even cooler if the report is in a expandable format so you get the assets of the user it self, and then a list of locations he is managing, but with a + sign in front of it, so you can expand that part by clicking on the + sign before you actually send it to the printer.

Describe alternatives you've considered We have been thinking about making some kind of custom report, usually with too many fields and then use Excel filtering options etc but we could not get it to work.

Additional context Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

stale[bot] commented 3 years ago

Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!