Closed bgokden closed 6 years ago
Thank you. I'm working on this part, actually, trying to make it easier to detect and support cases like this. I will merge this now but how things are implemented might actually change soon-ish… :)
Thank you.
@bgokden I've pushed the start of an easier, semi-automated support for interface types and have thus refactored your PortSelector
support. You'll see that it should be simpler now to add support for "interfaces" field. I will add support for the other ones probably tomorrow.
@metacosm thank you, we will refactor our code base once you finish.
I saw your fix for StringMatch and I decided same deserialiser can be used for PortSelector. Although Port selector can be "name" or "number" in protobuf definition, only number is documented. I think only number is supported as well.