sfc-gh-dszmolka
commented
10 months ago hello and thank you for submitting this issue ! this looks like something which works as expected. Please note that all Snowflake drivers (by default) perform certificate validation against certain hosts , which hosts are defined in the certificates itselves.
- using OCSP protocol for all non-.NET drivers
- using CRL for .NET driver here
both of those work on port 80.
Which exact hosts need to be reachable ? For non-.NET drivers it's simple to tell, you just run select system$allowlist(); in your Snowflake account; look for anything in the output starts with OCSP_ and allowlist those to be able to communicate over port 80.
For .NET its unfortunately not that straightforward, but what I would do if I would only need to allow only the specific CRL hosts on port 80:
- run the above system function in Snowflake
- take a note of the
SNOWFLAKE_DEPLOYMENTandSTAGEhosts - connect to each of them, and grab the whole certificate chain. Iterate over all the certificates in the chain and get the CRL URLs from it. With a dumb shell script, something like this (using one of the actual STAGE URLs in AWS EU Frankfurt deployment):
export hostname="sfc-eu-ds1-22-customer-stage.s3.amazonaws.com" echo | openssl s_client -showcerts -connect "$hostname":443 -servername "$hostname" 2>/dev/null | awk '/BEGIN/,/END/{ if(/BEGIN/){a++}; out="cert"a".pem"; print >out}'; for cert in cert*.pem; do echo "--> $cert"; openssl x509 -noout -text -subject -issuer -startdate -enddate -in $cert | grep -i crl; echo; doneI'm certain there are more sophisticated methods as well, but this would output
--> cert1.pem X509v3 CRL Distribution Points: URI:http://crl.r2m01.amazontrust.com/r2m01.crl
--> cert2.pem Digital Signature, Certificate Sign, CRL Sign X509v3 CRL Distribution Points: URI:http://crl.rootca1.amazontrust.com/rootca1.crl
--> cert3.pem Digital Signature, Certificate Sign, CRL Sign X509v3 CRL Distribution Points: URI:http://crl.rootg2.amazontrust.com/rootg2.crl
--> cert4.pem Digital Signature, Certificate Sign, CRL Sign X509v3 CRL Distribution Points: URI:http://s.ss2.us/r.crl
so does the job.
* allow those hosts on port 80, which are serving the CRLs the certificates indicate. Don't forget to also allow the CRL URL's in the root CA's which sign the last intermediary CA in the chain (that is, if the root CA has any CRL, did not check. Might not have it.)
Some notes:
* note1: this might still break in the future, if Snowflake decides to implement OCSP in .NET driver too, in parity with the rest of the driver software. Then you'll need to allow the hosts as mentioned above
* note2: allowlisting only the particular CRL hosts only work up until the point the certificates are the same. If e.g. an intermediary CA is changed and it has a different CRL endpoint, you'll need to allow that too. If you have an option to allow hostnames with a wildcard, then the procedure explained at https://docs.snowflake.com/en/user-guide/ocsp#snowflake-on-aws might work better and would provide resiliency)
Hope this helps. Closing this issue as it is not an issue with the .NET driver and is an expected behaviour.
What version of .NET driver are you using? 2.1.5 and 2.2.0
What operating system and processor architecture are you using? AWS Lambda running .NET 6.0
What version of .NET framework are you using? .NET 6.0
What did you do? We have a lambda in a VPC that makes a Snowflake DB connection. After upgrading from 2.1.3 to 2.2.0 we started getting timeouts opening the Snowflake connection. No code changes were made outside of the update, and our logs showed specifically that a
connection.open()line was the last action take by the lambda before a timeout. This only occurred in the code deployed to the lambda but not from my local machine, which continued to work as expected.What did you expect to see? Ideally we expected that the lambda Snowflake connectivity would continue to work instead of timing out. After some investigation we found that our VPC security group needed an extra egress port added on an additional port(we opened up everything, and have not narrowed down the actual port being used). We had 443 already open, but after the update to 2.1.5 and 2.2.0 we needed another port open. This lambda makes a simple Snowflake query formats the data and returns it so no other processes would have required this extra port.
We have mitigated the error by opening egress traffic to all ports. Please let us know what port we need traffic opened to so we can secure our lambda a bit more
Also note, we tried every version from 2.13, 2.1.4, 2.15, and 2.2.0. Our connectivity started breaking on version 2.1.5