Closed TerrorJack closed 8 years ago
I've functions from this package a couple of times. While the functions can be very useful, the main downside is that it was written way before AMP. As a result, many functions are Monad
when they could be Applicative
and MonadPlus
when they are Alternative
. The love for lists is also too strong for my favour, at least in the destructing parts (like andM
). That may not align too well with classy-prelude's idea of
encourage the use of appropriate data structures such as Vectors or HashMaps instead of always using lists and associated lists
I'd revise / make a modern version of it before including it in a prelude, I think.
@nh2 You are right. Closing this pull request for now. Seems developing a monad-loops
alternative suitable for post-AMP era is a good idea..or maybe we can implement them directly in classy-prelude
?
I'd be in favor of adding them directly here. I also have no objection if you want to create a separate packages with those functions and import them.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, 6:41 AM Shao Cheng notifications@github.com wrote:
@nh2 https://github.com/nh2 You are right. Closing this pull request for now. Seems developing a monad-loops alternative suitable for post-AMP era is a good idea..or maybe we can implement them directly in classy-prelude?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/snoyberg/classy-prelude/pull/123#issuecomment-197150846
I propose exporting monadic loop combinators from
monad-loops
package. The package is actively maintained and widely used, does not introduce extra dependencies, and the combinators are much more comprehensive thanwhenM
andunlessM
currently provided inclassy-prelude
.