Closed kbillings closed 9 years ago
Yeah, these changes look good to me.
Not sure what others think about this, but do you feel like the emphasis on safe improves the documentation? It seems safe is a reasonable default, especially for this module, and possibly steals attention from the other two bolded things (Unsafe and function names).
Here's a comparison:
I do agree that in Haskell every function should be assumed safe by default.
Ok I'll remove the emphasis on the safe functions.
@MaxGabriel If I'm not mistaken, you recently worked on this documentation, correct?