Closed danwdart closed 2 years ago
This library doesn't need it to work, it's just useful to guarantee that documentation examples are correct.
After reading the links you mentioned, and browsing the topic a little, it's not clear to me how we should achieve the same feature without cabal-doctest
library.
Do you happen to know a working alternative ? If there aren't any, I guess we have 2 options:
xml-conduit
cabal-doctest
dependency altogetherI'm opening https://github.com/snoyberg/xml/pull/171 right now, waiting for the outcome of 1/ to either close or merge it.
I've upgraded calab-doctest
dependency through https://github.com/snoyberg/xml/pull/174, which should be compatible with GHC 9.2 .
Don't hesitate to re-open this issue if you still observe an issue.
See: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/cabal-doctest which references: https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/2327
Does this library still need it specifically? cabal-doctest blocks things from building on ghc 9.2.