Closed AdamBJ closed 9 years ago
No, I think it's impossible. There is a case t2 = t2'
(#step = 0) under the condition of t2 ==>* t2'
(#step ∈ Nat) , but then t2 ==> t2'
(#step = 1) cannot be true.
Ok, I'll stick with induction for that question then, thanks.
I want to apply the reverse of multi_R to H0 in the context, does something like that exist?