Closed DaniJonesOcean closed 1 year ago
Minor comments on text:
Line 39: do you mean to say “30°E, 70°E”?
Changed
Line 40: 60°S
Added
Line 112: suggest to include the reference for the data collection here
Added
Line 119: paper
Changed
Lines 124-125 and 198-204: In my opinion, these are unnecessary introductions to subsections, as was also pointed out by one reviewer. Please re-consider whether preambles are really needed.
Removed
Line 78 and 224: „in latitude and longitude“ seems unnecessary
Removed
Line 247: perhaps better say “thickness of the water column”
???
Line 331: parenthesis and period missing
Added
Line 372: „becomes“ is used twice in this sentence
Fixed
Line 446: an
Fixed
Section 3.5 in particular as well as other text passages: the word “relatively” is used somewhat inflationary
Great point! That word was heavily overused. Reduced to just four instances now.
---> Text improvements done
Suggestions for figure improvements:
Discrete colorbars: This may also be a matter of taste and hence suggestions rather than requests, but discrete increments generally provide more quantitative detail in the figures. While some of your figures employ discrete colorbars, this could be used to improve figs 2, 4-8 and 12 as well.
Excellent point. Now revised.
Fig 3: Why are different colors used for the profiles?
For easier comparison with other figures; each class gets its own colour
Fig11: the tickmarks on the colorbar do not quite agree with the increments
Fixed.
Fig 12,13: “latitude”, “longitude” labels are missing
For consistency with the other plots, we've left these off
Fig 13: remove right-hand y-axis labels
Done
Fig 14: The panels are missing grids and need more detailed captions
Yes, the caption did need to be more detailed, thanks for catching that. It has been updated. Figure updated.
FigA1: very small fonts, consider using only one ylabel “depth (m)” on the left hand side and remove all other labels, as the panels overall share identical y-axes. Perhaps include titles with larger fonts inside of the panels
Modified.
Minor comments on text:
Line 247: perhaps better say “thickness of the water column”
Suggestions for figure improvements: