Closed DaniJonesOcean closed 3 years ago
I'm not sure I follow here. Do you mean plotting the clusters that are found differently, or clustering in a different space?
I'm thinking about plotting the clusters differently. Like this!
In this example, the green color represents the central Weddell Gyre class. Here I've separated out the data by depth (pressure). So we can see how the T-S properties of each class change with depth/pressure.
You can sort of get the same information from the plots showing what the average profiles look like, but I think this is a nice way to see the relative properties at a glance.
These look great! Have you tried to put all the profiles together, without separating by depth... I think it can be even more informative.
Thanks! Not yet - I will put that on the to-do list. :)
Very cool! Following on Isa's comment, maybe one could plot the clusters individually and use depth as the colouring?
Good idea ✨
Hi both! Finally managed to do this. This is just a proof-of-concept for the individual clusters with depth as colouring as suggested by @maikejulie, so don't spend too much time analysing it. The one in the top-right is the "Antarctic class", as you might guess.
I love the patterns here (e.g. the contrast between K=4 and K=5). Potentially a lot of good physical stuff happening, to the extent that the classes really are spatially coherent.
Edit: Ignore the titles. They're wrong and will be fixed on the next iteration.
And here is the single T-S plot (with all depths) as suggested by @isazar. :)
This combined with the above "by depth" colouring make for a good pair. Thanks for the suggestions!
Very cool! These are the same as in the spatial plots, no?
They look great!! acouple of things: the labels ("..at 100 dbar") are wrong, aren't it? and, can i be picky (and annoying)? 🙄 can you please swap temperature with salinity axes?
thank you!!
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021, 23:36 Dan(i) Jones @.***> wrote:
Hi both! Finally managed to do this. This is just a proof-of-concept for the individual clusters with depth as colouring as suggested by @maikejulie https://github.com/maikejulie, so don't spend too much time analysing it. The one in the top-right is the "Antarctic class", as you might guess.
[image: compare_TS_class_depths 001] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11757453/133336938-bc1f3403-857b-4bed-b146-f81cdca8c859.png
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/so-wise/weddell_gyre_clusters/issues/23#issuecomment-919530522, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEO74ROMMDPEPYORMIKW2JDUB656JANCNFSM5AZXPHRA . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
Very cool! These are the same as in the spatial plots, no?
Yes! They're the same as for the 10-class model. I'll put together something more coherent soon, with the label maps, T-S, etc. all in one place for easier comparison.
They look great!! acouple of things: the labels ("..at 100 dbar") are wrong, aren't it? and, can i be picky (and annoying)? 🙄 can you please swap temperature with salinity axes? thank you!!
Yep, titles are wrong. And sure. 😉
@isazar, done. ;)
Since I've added T/S plotting capabilities to the software package, I think this is pretty much done. Closing now!
It would be interesting to see T/S plots clustered into profiles. This would have to be done by depth or perhaps over a depth range.
We would probably have to plot them iteratively over different depths, but they could be added to the same plot, of course.