docs: update architecture diagram

Walkthrough

The changes include updates to the README.md file, which now provides enhanced details about the ByteMeBurger API, including a new customer registration endpoint, improved error handling, and updated service configurations. Additionally, JWT tokens are now required for endpoint protection, and the architecture diagram has been updated. In the test suite, the CreateOrderSteps.cs file has been modified to remove unnecessary comments and add a new step to verify the publication of an integration event during order creation.

Changes

File	Change Summary
`README.md`	Expanded API description, added customer registration endpoint details, updated error handling, and JWT requirements. Updated architecture diagram from `aws-infra-phase-3.png` to `aws-infra-phase-4.png`.
`tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Orders/Gherkin/CreateOrderSteps.cs`	Added new step definition for verifying integration event publication and removed commented-out lines for clarity.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant API
    participant Dispatcher

    User->>API: Register new customer
    API-->>User: Return JWT token
    User->>API: Create order with JWT
    API->>Dispatcher: Publish integration event
    Dispatcher-->>API: Confirm event published

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@italopessoa has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 29 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/faq) for further information.

📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 09aa738caf3b161eed2875f808abe4af03989fc3 and cc02c1e9d338d34a543f3033729d43e2520986c3.

📜 Recent review details

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 09aa738caf3b161eed2875f808abe4af03989fc3 and cc02c1e9d338d34a543f3033729d43e2520986c3.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

* `aws-infra-phase-4.png` is excluded by `!**/*.png`

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

* `README.md` (1 hunks) * `tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Orders/Gherkin/CreateOrderSteps.cs` (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

* tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Orders/Gherkin/CreateOrderSteps.cs

🔇 Additional comments (2)

README.md (2)

Line range hint `1-178`: **Verify documentation accuracy with current implementation.** The README contains comprehensive documentation about JWT tokens, customer registration endpoints, and infrastructure details. Let's ensure this documentation accurately reflects the current implementation. Let's verify the documentation's accuracy: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the documented endpoints and authentication requirements # match the actual implementation. # Check controller implementations for JWT and role requirements ast-grep --pattern 'class $_Controller : $_ { $$$ [Authorize($_)] $$$ }' # Check for customer registration endpoint ast-grep --pattern '[Route("api/customers")] class $_Controller : $_ { $$$ [HttpPost] $$$ }' ``` --- `178-178`: **Verify the new architecture diagram exists in the repository.** The architecture diagram has been updated from `aws-infra-phase-3.png` to `aws-infra-phase-4.png`. Let's verify the existence and accessibility of both the old and new diagrams:

✅ Verification successful

**Architecture diagram update verified successfully** The new diagram `aws-infra-phase-4.png` exists in the repository, and the old diagram `aws-infra-phase-3.png` is no longer referenced in the documentation. The README.md correctly references only the new diagram.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check if both architecture diagram files exist in the repository # and ensure the old diagram is not orphaned. # Check if the new diagram exists if ! fd -t f "aws-infra-phase-4.png"; then echo "ERROR: New diagram 'aws-infra-phase-4.png' not found" exit 1 fi # Check if the old diagram is still referenced anywhere if rg -l "aws-infra-phase-3.png" > /dev/null; then echo "WARNING: Old diagram 'aws-infra-phase-3.png' is still referenced" fi ``` Length of output: 276 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to verify the diagram files # List all PNG files in the repository echo "PNG files in repository:" fd -e png # Check for any references to phase-3 or phase-4 diagrams echo -e "\nReferences to architecture diagrams:" rg -i "aws-infra-phase-[34]\.png" ``` Length of output: 345

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` or `@coderabbitai title` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

soat-fiap / FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger