How can one understand this spec?

[Injac]

I have difficulties in even understanding the notation of the protocol specification. Is that intended? If you want people to adapt the protocol to different platforms, a real specification would be very helpful. Even an RFC is easier to read than what you have here. I don't expect an answer at all, because I see that this issue is not a big concern for the socket.io implementers. If so, it would be reflected in a better documentation. I think reverse-engineering of the protocol will be less error-prone than the docs. Hope to see some changes soon.

[shuoli84]

The only doc meaningful for socketio is its js implementation. +1

发自我的 iPhone

在 2015年11月27日，21:22，Ilija Injac notifications@github.com 写道：

I have difficulties in even understanding the notation of the protocol specification. Is that intended? If you want people to adapt the protocol to different platforms, a real specification would be very helpful. Even an RFC is easier to read than what you have here. I don't expect an answer at all, because I see that this issue is not a big concern for the socket.io implementers. If so, it would be reflected in a better documentation. I think reverse-engineering of the protocol will be less error-prone than the docs. Hope to see some changes soon.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[mrniko]

@shuoli84 +1

[rauchg]

@lnjac @shuoli84 @mrniko we're working on a proper RFC. This was more of an informal / quick guide that we wrote while implementing the JS parsers. I appreciate the feedback.

[rauchg]

Btw, if you have examples of what your ideal specifications would be, please post them here.

[rauchg]

I'm closing this in favor of #14, let's continue the discussion there.