Closed nic-lan closed 3 years ago
I think there are some plans to do this but it's not something I'm personally planning to implement right now. The way I see it, provided SR is not depending on ActionCable as a bridge, it should be totally feasible to use SR in the same way - i.e.
However if SR is depending on the ActionCable interface, it may become more tricky. I don't know the details.
Regarding live
becoming an alternative to SR. I'm not sure what you mean by "full". Basically, live
is, for what it's worth, feature complete. We will certainly continue to develop it, but from my point of view, but I think the problem space is fairly well understood and it's more a matter of reducing friction than designing new abstractions.
I understand.
thank you.
I'm not sure what you mean by "full".
it was not exactly the best phrasing. apologies for that.
Hi,
very cool project.
I noticed that a rails adapter has been recently added and that it has been used in one of the examples provided in the
live
gem.Since
live
gem readme is linkingstimulus-reflex
, i would like to know if there is any plan and/or interest to somehow allow integration ofasync-websocket
with it ( as acable-ready
alternative for example ) or the idea here is more likely to extendlive
gem to be a full alternative to stimulus-reflex.Thank you.