Pure project exploration with TDD on Guard.
Did RuboCop-driven refactors to match code-style I use for easier understanding.
Experimented with feature to allow private constants to be referenced using strings.
Use Ruby 3.2.2 for the newer syntax sugar.
For sure not mergeable.
It may be a source of useful ideas in the project. We can cherry pick concepts from here to be merged in separate PRs using code style already established in the repo. One thing we could also add is RuboCop config matching that code style.
I recommend to check individual commits (and/or commit-sets nearby).
Pure project exploration with TDD on Guard. Did RuboCop-driven refactors to match code-style I use for easier understanding. Experimented with feature to allow private constants to be referenced using strings. Use Ruby 3.2.2 for the newer syntax sugar.
For sure not mergeable. It may be a source of useful ideas in the project. We can cherry pick concepts from here to be merged in separate PRs using code style already established in the repo. One thing we could also add is RuboCop config matching that code style.
I recommend to check individual commits (and/or commit-sets nearby).
Please suggest topics that you are interested in.
Types of Changes
Contribution