Closed takikawa closed 10 years ago
Thanks!
I appreciate your explanation of the for-label / include-section problem I had.
About the directory layout. If I have understood the structure of multiple packages correctly, the outer metapict holds (future) collections such as metapict, metapict-doc, metapict-examples etc. Now metapict/metapict holds the collection that (require metapict) should require. After checking the info file, I see that it isn't declared as a 'multi package yet. I'll look into that.
If you'd like to add additional collections in the package in the future, then yes it would make sense to use 'multi
. In that case, you would want to move the main.rkt
from the top-level directory. Note that if you were looking at the structure of the math collection for guidance, the sub-directories like "math-doc" and so on are actually separate packages so doesn't necessarily translate well to your use case.
This pull request removes a few warnings that occur when building the docs. The identifier hyperlinks should then work better. Also adjust some contracts.