Closed stamourv closed 9 years ago
That function is moving from unstable/sequence to racket/sequence.
unstable/sequence
racket/sequence
Inlining it preserves backwards compatibility while removing the dependency on unstable.
Other options would be:
unstable-lib
in-syntax
That function is moving from
unstable/sequencetoracket/sequence.Inlining it preserves backwards compatibility while removing the dependency on unstable.
Other options would be:
unstable-lib, and keep usingin-syntaxfromunstable/sequence. This is backwards compatible with 6.2.1 and before.in-syntaxfromracket/sequence. This is not compatible with 6.2.1 and before, which can be remedied with a package version exception.