Network source for sending/receiving support

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Can you add support for network sources like airserv-ng? If you do, 
1. You haven't to care about network card support - server does it for you.
2. It's possible to use network sources, like APs. Whoever really use that.
3. It is possible to run this software even on other OS like Windows, it must 
just have working network packet source. On Windows, on Atheros chipet you can 
either use CommView WiFi, or use airserg-ng from AiroWizard which uses CVWF 
drivers (this program probably isn't 100% legal, but it is a problem of a 
person who wrote it and TamoSoft :)). Or you can run it on Linups in a WM and 
having Windows as host OS.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 3 Jan 2012 at 5:04

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I haven't used it, but it's worth looking in to when I get a chance.

Original comment by cheff...@tacnetsol.com on 3 Jan 2012 at 5:19

• Added labels: Priority-Low, Type-Enhancement
• Removed labels: Priority-Medium, Type-Defect

[GoogleCodeExporter]

In aircrack suite you just have to support address like 127.0.0.1:12345 instead 
of capture interface. If you'll implement it, i advise you to add a URI schema 
to address, like airserv://127.0.0.1:12345.

Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 3 Jan 2012 at 5:22

[GoogleCodeExporter]

If you do it, it will be really nice, then i can try it on Windows without need 
to install linups as main OS. Could you then write a manual how to complile 
that thing on windows?

Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 3 Jan 2012 at 5:25

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Currently talking with the aircrack-ng team to get Reaver integrated into the 
aircrack-ng suite. Support for airserv will likely be added as part of this 
process, though I can't give you any kind of a timeline right now.

Original comment by cheff...@tacnetsol.com on 4 Jan 2012 at 2:58

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Thanks! I've noticed that there is no format description for airserv format 
(opensource is so opensource, huh?). Documentation is not just information, 
it's like an agreement that certifies, that things described in it most likely 
would not be changed, and other things can be changed.

I tried to use newer aircrack suite with older airserv and noticed that they 
don't work together and even there is no error message. Seems, they simply 
changed the protocol so that it's impossible to determine what protocol version 
is used by the server. (Open source don't care about binary compability). If 
you already contacted them, could you ask them 

1) that they document their airserv protocol
2) that they add some kind of version information, so in case they change this 
protocol client programs have a chance to notice that?

Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 5 Jan 2012 at 6:01

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Issue 110 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by cheff...@tacnetsol.com on 8 Jan 2012 at 4:56

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hello there your work is  a master piece however i would like to ask you 
something, if i have a old router would it the program still try to bruteforce 
a router?, can u not create something that is able to detect if the router 
supports wps or not it will be must easy, my idea was to track the product via 
mac address of the year of the model that it was created example if 00:34 was 
created since 2 years ago therefore it will the program will be able to detect 
that its a new router that can support wps, please tell me if your code was 
able to detect if the router has wps or not thanks

Original comment by leacocks...@gmail.com on 24 Jan 2012 at 7:49

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Read the documentation / out put from the wash utility included with reaver. It 
does exactly what you are asking for : Shows what trasnmitting accesspoint in 
your vincinity that supports WPS and thus is prone to an attack with reaver.
In other words RTFM.

Original comment by jdsmob...@gmail.com on 24 Jan 2012 at 11:28

[GoogleCodeExporter]

And stop derailing too.

Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 26 Jan 2012 at 11:22