softlang / metalib

A Chrestomathy of DSL implementations
https://softlang.github.io/metalib
9 stars 1 forks source link

Systematic license information for all web pages and contributions #24

Open rlaemmel opened 7 years ago

rlaemmel commented 7 years ago

cc @sschauss cc @johanneshaertel

Basically, we need to do more or less exactly the same thing for MetaLib as for 101:

https://github.com/101companies/101rails/issues/197

In summary (as a checklist):

le-cram commented 7 years ago

Is this done?

kevin-klein commented 7 years ago

i talked to @rlaemmel and we agreed that we use MIT License for code as CC A 4.0 does not cover things like linking and binary artifacts. For 101wiki we went with MIT for code and CC A 4.0 for the wiki content. Should we do it the same?

rlaemmel commented 7 years ago

We could possibly apply MIT also to the models of metalib because it is highly structured "code". What do you guys think?

kevin-klein commented 7 years ago

i think it would be a good idea.