Closed smarru closed 6 years ago
@smarru Yes I think it should be. @jadhao what do you think about this?
@smarru @kadupitiya Yes. We can set it to a fraction of the number of total steps S. For now, lets set it to 0.1 S
Ok. Do you want me to map it inside the c++ program?
Yes, that seems the best place for now. We can similarly adapt the density output frequency to S so that the program produces some result even for small S; it won't be very good, but at least we will have a plot.
@jadhao Ok. I will do this.
@smarru I have submitted that through a new pull request. @jadhao Please have a look and let me know if that is ok. Thanks
@smarru @kadupitiya I believe this has been approved. Shall we close this issue
Yes. I also think so.
Yes I verified this on nanohub as well.
This could be a non-issues, started a thread to discuss it.
Currently, it seems from the log messages that production begins always at 100000 steps. I am wondering if this should adapt to simulation time steps?