Open hdmeyer opened 7 years ago
Group # | Exercise 1 | Comments | Exercise 2 | Comments | Exercise 3 | Comments | Exercise 4 | Comments | Exercise 5 | Comments | Exercise 6 | Comments | Exercise 7 | Comments | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14 | 10 | Execellent | 10 | Good explanation | 10 | Excellent | 9 | Solution is ok, but too slow and no discussion about the speed issues are presented | 9 | Very good, not printing separations as NRC sudokus | 10 | Excellent | 10 | Right | 10.6 |
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
@hdmeyer
Due to the graphical nature of the exercises we chose to print the conclusions for the exercises in the console. Hence, running exercise7 yields the following conclusion:
====================
Assignment 5 / Lab 5
====================
> Exercise 1
> Exercise 2
> Exercise 3
> Exercise 4
> Exercise 5
> Exercise 6
> Exercise 7
Average number of hints in standard minimal problem: 24.2
Average number of hints in NRC minimal problem: 17.2
@BertLisser could you please check this issue?
Now I see the conclusion. Right (=10)
The right conclusion (=10) ----- Original Message ----- From: "hdmeyer" notifications@github.com To: "software-engineering-amsterdam/ST2017_WG_14" ST2017_WG_14@noreply.github.com Cc: "Bert Lisser" Bert.Lisser@cwi.nl, "Mention" mention@noreply.github.com Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 1:08:36 PM Subject: Re: [software-engineering-amsterdam/ST2017_WG_14] Feedback Lab 5 (#8)
@BertLisser could you please check this issue?
-- You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/software-engineering-amsterdam/ST2017_WG_14/issues/8#issuecomment-336854854
@hdmeyer @BertLisser Thank you for the quick reply!