Closed ktdreyer closed 7 years ago
It shouldn't add patches_base
unless it differs from Version
. My guess would be it's related to vX.Y.Z tags logic.
I'll investigate after I finish rdopkg patch
refactor.
Thanks for the hint about the v
tag prefix! You're right, translating patches_base
to the RPM version number fixes this. https://review.rdoproject.org/r/5382
rdopkg new-version
unconditionally adds apatches_base
comment to my spec file, like so:I don't think this is useful. rdopkg should probably update the
patches_base
comment if it finds one, but not unconditionally insert a new one. What do you think?