CDB Tech Sprint Name - Githubissues

MichalaH commented 3 years ago

All, Susan has dubbed this effort CDB X and the name seems to have stuck. But I would like to use this as a "test vote" in the event we need to have actual votes in the future. I hope that we can use the meetings and GitHub discussions to come to agreements on issues, but if not, we can use this to put things to vote. Please feel free to provide feedback if you have any.

Issue: Moving forward from now, we will use CDB X as the name that refers to this SOCOM sponsored tech sprint effort in discussions, documentation, reports, etc. Vote: Yes, No, Other (list alternative) - please comment with your vote

One vote per company/agency, please list the company/agency you are representing when you vote.

Voting will stay open for 3 business days (until noon Aug 3), at which time this issue will be closed.

PresagisHermann commented 3 years ago

Vote: Yes Compagny: Presagis

DavidFLOR commented 3 years ago

Yes Eagle Cap Systems, LLC

geogr4 commented 3 years ago

Vote: Yes Joint Staff J7

vwhisker commented 3 years ago

yes PSU/ARL

ryanfranz commented 3 years ago

Yes FlightSafety

cnreediii commented 3 years ago

Yes

Carl Reed

One caveat - in the Engineering Report, we are also referring to OGC CDB 2.0 discussions by way of background and as a source of some of the requirements and use cases for the CDB X work.

lilleyse commented 3 years ago

Yes Cesium

jerstlouis commented 3 years ago

Yes Ecere

MichalaH commented 3 years ago

This vote is on behalf of Mike Lokuta. CAE USA votes Yes for CDB X by virtue of an email he sent. He does not currently have access to this repository, we are working on getting him added.

UnclePoole commented 3 years ago

Yes Geometric Progress LLC

sofwerx / cdb2-concept

CDB Tech Sprint Name #13