Closed garious closed 4 years ago
@sakridge points out that what we call account is what Ethereum and Libra both call account too. What Libra calls a resource is more similar to what we call Account.data
.
What we call an account is consistent with all non-UTXO (aka account-based) blockchains call an account. cc: @aeyakovenko
The data structure named "account" is more general than the thing traditionally called an account (that thing that holds your balance at a bank). It's a thing that holds some number of native tokens and optionally a chunk of program-defined serialized data, that may represent program state or some asset (i.e. ERC-20 token). Calling that thing an account is causing newcomers confusion.
This does not match my understanding. I was under the impression that the confusion came from Solana's ability to separate of the concepts of authority and address for an account.
where: authority: an entity (identified by a public key) that has the power to debit the account balance or modify the account's state, often enforced by the owner program, sometimes the own program itself address: a public key that is used to name the account, find it in the bank
Other chains typically conflow these concepts.
I don't see how renaming Account to Resource alleviates this confusion.
I agree with Rob. We need to find the real source of confusion. Maybe it's with the notion of authority. Our use of account is consistent with more popular account-based blockchains.
Problem
The data structure named "account" is more general than the thing traditionally called an account (that thing that holds your balance at a bank). It's a thing that holds some number of native tokens and optionally a chunk of program-defined serialized data, that may represent program state or some asset (i.e. ERC-20 token). Calling that thing an account is causing newcomers confusion.
Proposed Solution
Rename "Account" to "Resource".
Alternatives considered: