ontology trait definition doesn t match actual scale checked when uploading

[bauchetg]

From @pvnsprasad files definition and data checking needs to be harmonized for two traits: For "root neck length visual rating 0-7|CO:0000022" the actual trait value range checked is 3/5/7 @aafolabi : which one is the right scale? 0-7 or 3/5/7? ease of peeling root cortex visual rating 1-7|CO:0000116 the actual trait value range checked is 3/7 @aafolabi : which one is the right scale? 1-7 or 3/7?

[pvnsprasad]

apical pubescence visual rating 0-7|CO:0000026 value is 1,2 but ontology shows 0,3,5,7 unexpanded apical leaf color visual rating 1-9|CO:0000101, This trait value should be one of 3/5/7

[aafolabi]

root neck length visual rating 0-7|CO:0000022" should be scored on a scale of 0, 3 , 5 and 7 as described. I think a variable has to be described for ease of peel (1,2,3). apical pubescence visual rating 0-7|CO:0000026 : The scale of measure remains 0/3/5/7. The field technician used 0/1/2 (0= absent; 1 = Moderate (same as 5) and 2 = Highly Pubescence ( same as 7)without considering the ontology. I think you may have to convert to this scales of measurement.

unexpanded apical leaf color visual rating 1-9|CO:0000101 : It remains 3/5/7/9

The variable names showing "1-9" is at the requirement of the CO guys.

[aafolabi]

Ease of peel with scale 1,2 and 3 have been created (CO:0000308). Apical pubescence with scale 0,1,2 also created (CO:0000309). All other variables remain unchanged @bauchetg @pvnsprasad

[bauchetg]

apical pubescence visual rating 0-7|CO:0000026 value is actually 0,1,2 but ontology shows 0,3,5,7

[aafolabi]

CO:0000309 apical pubescence visual rating 0-2 created.