The majority of repositories on the https://github.com/solid/ organization are actually software repositories.
However, the repository overview currently seems to incorrectly assume that the main contents are panels, and that all activities in this organization can be aligned with panels. This, however, is not in line with reality.
label: editorial
The majority of repositories on the https://github.com/solid/ organization are actually software repositories.
However, the repository overview currently seems to incorrectly assume that the main contents are panels, and that all activities in this organization can be aligned with panels. This, however, is not in line with reality.
Concretely, the entire list Repositories Without Known Link to Activity that can be Archived is inaccurate. These should be listed under a heading "Software projects" (or similar), because that is exactly what they are.
My proposal is as follows. Let's restructure the repo-overview.md repository with a structure similar to:
Assigning to Community Manager.