Update uc-survey.md

[KaiGilb]

filled out the survey on behalf of graphMetrix we are creating a pod (TrinPod)

Thanks

[csarven]

Thanks for submitting a response! Happy to merge right after the following:

If you want to stick to using "+3" can you please update the PR with a link to an open implementation? Otherwise, "+1" would be more appropriate. (As for TimBL's +3s, we need to add a link as well.)

As we are running under the W3C CG ( https://www.w3.org/community/solid/ ), we just have a minor requirement in that all contributions to the specs/panels etc should come from CG members. If you can join, which is free and open to all, that'd be great.

[KaiGilb]

Hi Sarven,

Thanks

I did sign up for the group, that required me to sign up for w3c. My login into w3c works, my login into the solid group will not log me in?

For the +3/+1 it is up to you. I can go over and change it. We are as of today +1, yet we will be +3 in a week or 3.

https://graphmetrix.com/trinpod

our publicly available Solid Pod build https://trinpod.us/ is clearly at +1

and that will change any day.

So with that information, do want me to change the +3 to +1 or just keep it as it is?

Kai Gilb Co-Founder graphMetrix - Europe Mobile: +47 911 92 303 Web: graphmetrix.com kai@graphmetrix.com

On 24 Nov 2020, at 10:14, Sarven Capadisli notifications@github.com wrote:

Thanks for submitting a response! Happy to merge right after the following:

If you want to stick to using "+3" can you please update the PR with a link to an open implementation? Otherwise, "+1" would be more appropriate. (As for TimBL's +3s, we need to add a link as well.)

As we are running under the W3C CG ( https://www.w3.org/community/solid/ https://www.w3.org/community/solid/ ), we just have a minor requirement in that all contributions to the specs/panels etc should come from CG members. If you can join, which is free and open to all, that'd be great.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/solid/authorization-panel/pull/129#issuecomment-732763058, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQYUDIJX2KDZQA2XTVRMYWTSRN2NXANCNFSM4UADPKZQ.

[KaiGilb]

I did not realize this was specifically for the new spec.

I have set all my ratings from +3 to +1

Kai Gilb Co-Founder graphMetrix - Europe Mobile: +47 911 92 303 Web: graphmetrix.com kai@graphmetrix.com

On 24 Nov 2020, at 14:28, Kai Gilb kai@graphmetrix.com wrote:

Hi Sarven,

Thanks

I did sign up for the group, that required me to sign up for w3c. My login into w3c works, my login into the solid group will not log me in?

For the +3/+1 it is up to you. I can go over and change it. We are as of today +1, yet we will be +3 in a week or 3.

https://graphmetrix.com/trinpod https://graphmetrix.com/trinpod

our publicly available Solid Pod build https://trinpod.us/ https://trinpod.us/ is clearly at +1

and that will change any day.

So with that information, do want me to change the +3 to +1 or just keep it as it is?

Kai Gilb Co-Founder graphMetrix - Europe Mobile: +47 911 92 303 Web: graphmetrix.com http://graphmetrix.com/ kai@graphmetrix.com mailto:kai@graphmetrix.com

> On 24 Nov 2020, at 10:14, Sarven Capadisli > wrote: > > > Thanks for submitting a response! Happy to merge right after the following: > > If you want to stick to using "+3" can you please update the PR with a link to an open implementation? Otherwise, "+1" would be more appropriate. (As for TimBL's +3s, we need to add a link as well.) > > As we are running under the W3C CG ( https://www.w3.org/community/solid/ ), we just have a minor requirement in that all contributions to the specs/panels etc should come from CG members. If you can join, which is free and open to all, that'd be great. > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub , or unsubscribe . >

[bblfish]

I did not realize this was specifically for the new spec.

You mean ACP? No this user survey is for the Use Cases. The ACP is a proposal to address the use cases, but we are not voting here on ACP. It may go through a lot of transformation before being accepted.

[csarven]

@KaiGilb

I did sign up for the group, that required me to sign up for w3c. My login into w3c works, my login into the solid group will not log me in?

I'm not sure. Do you need approval from your organisation? It may be the case if you've ticked the box on affiliation.

Thanks for updating the response.. feel free to send an update when things change. Will merge this PR as soon as I get a notification from W3C about you joining the CG.

[csarven]

@KaiGilb Please feel free to PR to provide URL for graphMetrix or distinguish from trinpod.

As for the UCs that's unclear to you, let's take them up in a panel meeting. We can revise the descriptions.