search

solid / deit

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Team
MIT License
6 stars 3 forks source link

DEIT Website #2

Open MarrelleBailey opened 3 years ago

MarrelleBailey commented 3 years ago
jeff-zucker commented 3 years ago

We'll need to decide if the pages should be on the solidproject.org website or are on a separate website linked from solidproject.org. The pro of staying with sp.org is that there is already a well established process of content creation. The con is somewhat less control.

If we go with a separate website, I suggest we use the deit.solidcommunity.net pod. Dogfooding (using a pod and perhaps other Solid tools) is good, but if anyone feels it would be a detriment to the involvement of newcomers, that is an important consideration too.

jeff-zucker commented 3 years ago

I too believe that integrating is essential (see https://github.com/solid/deit/issues/4). However, in addition to the general introductions that should be integrated in sp.org, there may be other parts that can live on their own the same way that the spec and administrators are featured on sp.org but also have detailed github pages only linked from sp.org. I would think we might have some sort of guestbook or place people could tell their inclusion/exculsion stories, a survey, etc.

So I'm for both - fully integrated in sp.org and a separate website (which doesn't need to be separate from the user's viewpoint, i.e. might still have sp.org addresses).