search

solid / specification

Solid Technical Reports
https://solidproject.org/TR/
MIT License
471 stars 42 forks source link

discussion#555 should be made to look like it's no longer active, with more blatant link to current "project"16 #635

Open TallTed opened 3 months ago

TallTed commented 3 months ago

Originally posted by @TallTed in https://github.com/solid/specification/pull/633#pullrequestreview-1920706382

Note that #555 still looks alive. Someone coming back to it, to see the latest addition to the bottom of the table, won't necessarily see the top-posted notice that it's been closed with new info being posted at https://github.com/orgs/solid/projects/16. I suggest adding <strike> or similar markup to make clear what is no longer valid.

Also note that https://github.com/orgs/solid/projects/16 requires more thinking, parsing the date column which is no longer in ISO-numerics, figuring out that "status — done" means the meeting has been held... and now, it's even more challenging, because the last dated entry is (was) March 5 (which is now in the past) and shows status "discussed" instead of "done" or at least "scheduled" which seem to make more sense for a date in the past....

attn @csarven @VirginiaBalseiro

VirginiaBalseiro commented 3 months ago

Thanks for this. I marked #555 as ARCHIVED, and deleted the "Discussed" status from the board as it is indeed confusing. You're right we need to think of improvements to it, perhaps we can discuss in a meeting.