Open DawnmarieDesJardins opened 2 years ago
Under the abstract and overview sections, and even in the table of contents, we organize it in order of "provisioning a Windows Server VM, migrating a SQL Server database to Azure SQL Managed Instance (SQL MI), and Azure Arc-enable an on-premises Windows Server VM"
However, in the actual labs, we do the "migrating a SQL Server database to Azure SQL Managed Instance (SQL MI)" step first. Can we make the order consistent across the different sections? I suggest switching the order of Exercise 1 and 2 since everywhere else, we mention that we start with creating a VM, not migrating SQL Server.
Under the current "Exercise 2: Create VM to Migrate Web Application", can we change the image of Windows Server VM being created from "Windows Server 2022 Datacenter - Gen 2" to "Windows Server 2022 Datacenter: Azure edition - Gen 2"?
I recommend making the following adjustments:
@pwidjaja99
Under the abstract and overview sections, and even in the table of contents, we organize it in order of "provisioning a Windows Server VM, migrating a SQL Server database to Azure SQL Managed Instance (SQL MI), and Azure Arc-enable an on-premises Windows Server VM"
However, in the actual labs, we do the "migrating a SQL Server database to Azure SQL Managed Instance (SQL MI)" step first. Can we make the order consistent across the different sections? I suggest switching the order of Exercise 1 and 2 since everywhere else, we mention that we start with creating a VM, not migrating SQL Server.
The Lab has the SQL MI first since it takes 1 hour to provision the SQL MI instance. Currently, it gets them creating the SQL MI instance, then has them continue with the next exercise and tells them to come back to finish the SQL MI exercise later.
Do you have an alternative suggestion to organizing the lab around the long provisioning time of SQL MI?
@pwidjaja99 @crpietschmann Thanks Patrick! The leads reviewed your suggestion and have decided to leave the lab order as is for the reasons Chris stated above.
Before the hands-on lab QC review:
Periods at the end of sentences in instructions 1 & 4 The sentence in parentheses is a full sentence and should be capitalized and punctuated Line 67 - Deployment in progress should be bolded as it's an instruction to the learner Line 69 - ...adjusting for any possible errors. Change to adjusting for errors (active voice) Line 71 - Once the ARM template is done being deployed, the status will change to complete... remove "done being"
Hands-on lab QC review. Let me know if you have any questions. WS and SQLServer QC Edit sheet.docx
The Lab has the SQL MI first since it takes 1 hour to provision the SQL MI instance. Currently, it gets them creating the SQL MI instance, then has them continue with the next exercise and tells them to come back to finish the SQL MI exercise later.
Do you have an alternative suggestion to organizing the lab around the long provisioning time of SQL MI?
-- Chris Pietschmann
From: pwidjaja99 @.> Date: Monday, September 26, 2022 at 1:24 PM To: solliancenet/Building-the-business-migration-case-with-Windows-Server-and-SQL-Server @.> Cc: Subscribed @.***> Subject: Re: [solliancenet/Building-the-business-migration-case-with-Windows-Server-and-SQL-Server] Hands on lab - SME review comments (Issue #4)
Under the abstract and overview sections, and even in the table of contents, we organize it in order of "provisioning a Windows Server VM, migrating a SQL Server database to Azure SQL Managed Instance (SQL MI), and Azure Arc-enable an on-premises Windows Server VM"
However, in the actual labs, we do the "migrating a SQL Server database to Azure SQL Managed Instance (SQL MI)" step first. Can we make the order consistent across the different sections? I suggest switching the order of Exercise 1 and 2 since everywhere else, we mention that we start with creating a VM, not migrating SQL Server.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/solliancenet/Building-the-business-migration-case-with-Windows-Server-and-SQL-Server/issues/4#issuecomment-1258374151, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC7Y2JXUMDCLYKJVZLBQALWAHL5DANCNFSM6AAAAAAQV46JR4. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
@crpietschmann Thanks Chris. Same edit sheet, updated information is in red with today's date. Let me know if you have questions. 10.12_WS and SQLServer QC Edit sheet.docx
MW SMEs
Thank you for your review! Please leave your feedback for our authors below.