For constructed DO GET DATA requests, it looks like the replies should be 1 single constructed DO/TLV.
Some examples:
Currently looks like:
>> GET DATA [CA] var. Application Related Data. [006e]
<<
5-16. Full AID. [004f]: d2760001240102010005000031880000 (216 bytes total)
>> GET DATA [CA] var. Cardholder related data. [0065]
<<
0-39. Name. [005b]: (9 bytes total)
Should be like this:
>> GET DATA [CA] var. Application Related Data. [006e]
<<
var. Application Related Data. [006e]:
5-16. Full AID. [004f]: d2760001240102010006086910620000
0-15. Historical bytes. [5f52]: 0073000080059000
3. Optional general feature management. [7f74]:
RSA modulus. [0081]: 20
var. Discretionary data objects. [0073]:
10. Extended capabilities. [00c0]: 3c00000004c000ff00ff
var. Algorithm attributes signature. [00c1]: 010800001100
var. Algorithm attributes decryption. [00c2]: 011000001100
var. Algorithm attributes authentication. [00c3]: 011000001100
7. PW status Bytes (PW1, PW1 max length, RC max length, PW3 max length, ...) [00c4]: 017f7f7f030003
60. fingerprints, 20 bytes each for sig,dec,auth. [00c5]: 682626763c5676d3f13b9d5adf6990fc44fc439243eee30ef73bfd53e25cb0d1dae105de65de9c0407c3573447987972785915e1bd5c5f1fc3c313bb
60. CA fingerprints, 20 bytes each. [00c6]: 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
12. List of 3, 4-byte dates for pubkey pairs. [00cd]: 5dfcf74e5dfc0bbc5dfc0c54 (224 bytes total)
>> GET DATA [CA] var. Cardholder related data. [0065]
<<
var. Cardholder related data. [0065]:
0-39. Name. [005b]:
2-8. Language preferences. [5f2d]:
1. Sex. [5f35]: 39 (11 bytes total)
For constructed DO GET DATA requests, it looks like the replies should be 1 single constructed DO/TLV.
Some examples:
Currently looks like:
Should be like this: