This pull request adds support for the PARAMETER_DESCRIPTION parameter which is required by the spec when the SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS parameter is supported.
In addition it adds the rdm_register_manufacturer_specific_simple() function. This function can be called by the user to add simple parameters. Simple parameters are all parameters that can be handled by rdm_simple_response_cb.
I am not sure if rdm_register_manufacturer_specific_simple() is a good design choice. I added it because I needed a way to test the implementation. An alternative would be to expose rdm_simple_response_cb to the user.
This is the last building block that is missing to support manufacturer specific parameters.
Please let me know what you think about this.
A simple example is provided in RDMManufacturerSpecificParameter.ino.
The example does not contain any documentation because I want to wait for your comments on this PR before documenting. I will add documentation once you are fine with the implementation.
Note: This PR is build on top of https://github.com/someweisguy/esp_dmx/pull/93. Therefore the commits from https://github.com/someweisguy/esp_dmx/pull/93 are also part of this PR. Only the last commit belongs to this PR
This pull request adds support for the PARAMETER_DESCRIPTION parameter which is required by the spec when the SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS parameter is supported.
In addition it adds the
rdm_register_manufacturer_specific_simple()function. This function can be called by the user to add simple parameters. Simple parameters are all parameters that can be handled byrdm_simple_response_cb. I am not sure ifrdm_register_manufacturer_specific_simple()is a good design choice. I added it because I needed a way to test the implementation. An alternative would be to exposerdm_simple_response_cbto the user.This is the last building block that is missing to support manufacturer specific parameters. Please let me know what you think about this.
A simple example is provided in
RDMManufacturerSpecificParameter.ino. The example does not contain any documentation because I want to wait for your comments on this PR before documenting. I will add documentation once you are fine with the implementation.